Chimpanzees rationally revise their beliefs
The selective revision of beliefs in light of new evidence has been considered one of the hallmarks of human-level rationality.
In a new Science study, researchers report that chimpanzees can also update their beliefs on the basis of the quantity and quality of new evidence.
New evidence? No problem. Chimps can weigh conflicting clues, just like humans
Study is first to suggest our closest relatives think about their own thoughts
30 Oct 20252:00 PM ET By Cathleen O’Grady
Editor’s summary
The ability of humans to think rationally and weigh the evidence when making a choice is well known. Such decision making requires a metacognitive process in which an individual can evaluate an overall set of evidence and make the best supported choice. Whether other animals can also do this has been unknown. Schleihauf et al. tested whether our closest relatives, chimpanzees, were able to evaluate weak and strong evidence regarding the location of a food reward (see the Perspective by Hare). They found that the chimps correctly inferred the most rational location based on the strength of the evidence that they received about the reward’s location. —Sacha Vignieri
Abstract
The selective revision of beliefs in light of new evidence has been considered one of the hallmarks of human-level rationality. However, tests of this ability in other species are lacking. We examined whether and how chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) update their initial belief about the location of a reward in response to conflicting evidence. Chimpanzees responded to counterevidence in ways predicted by a formal model of rational belief revision: They remained committed to their initial belief when the evidence supporting the alternative belief was weaker, but they revised their initial belief when the supporting evidence was stronger. Results suggest that this pattern of belief revision was guided by the explicit representation and weighing of evidence. Taken together, these findings indicate that chimpanzees metacognitively evaluate conflicting pieces of evidence within a reflective process.
https://www.science.org/content/article/new-evidence-no-problem-chimps-can-weigh-conflicting-clues-just-humans








